Showing posts with label termination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label termination. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Sacked for a good reason, but employee still wins dismissal

Did you know that an employer who has a valid reason for terminating an employee can still fail in an unfair dismissal case?

Background
A Financial Planner had been performance managed over two years. He had not improved. During this process he was given two written warnings. On his final warning it was made clear to him that he needed to achieve some basic targets to remain employed. He failed to achieve the targets.
He was called to a meeting to discuss his employment. He requested that the meeting be rescheduled so that he could have a support person attend with him. The employer refused and proceeded to sacked him.
The Financial Planner lodged an unfair dismissal claim with Fair Work Australia. In considering a claim the tribunal must consider whether the termination was harsh, unjust or unreasonable. The tribunal found that the Financial Planner’s poor performance was a valid reason for the sacking, but that he had been unfairly dismissed because the manner in which he was sacked was unreasonable . The company was ordered to pay him compensation.

Law
There are a couple of key lessons/ principles from this which are important to note:
1. The power difference
One of the key differences between employment law and most other law is that employment law recognises there is a power imbalance between employer (powerful, lots of resources) and employee. It deliberately sets out to level the playing field.

2. The process of sacking a person is as important as the reason for sacking them
The Fair Work Act 2009 advises that a person is unfairly dismissed if it is “harsh, unjust or unreasonable”. Criteria for determining these are contained in the Act. Cases also provide clarification.
In this case, the tribunal said it was unreasonable for the employer to refuse to postpone the meeting so that he could have a support person present.

3. A support person can be requested for any disciplinary meeting, not just the final meeting
This is also provided by the Act. Other cases tell us that refusing a support person in the early stages has the same effect.
Laker v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Ltd [2010] FWA 5713

*Please note I am not a lawyer, nor am I qualified as one. I am however an Employee Relations professional whose job it is to understand and apply employment law, often in some odd situations such as the one above!

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Redundancy payouts

Its happens to all of us. If you haven't yet had the experience of being laid off (or retrenched), chances are that the current economy will serve it up to you shortly. In the last week I've had two phone calls from friends in a post-redundancy panic asking: what should I be getting paid? Here's the advice I gave them.

*Please note, this advice is for staff employees, who sign a common law contract when they first start, have no EBA, and often are not under an award.

1. Annual leave paid out
Whenever you leave a job, whether you resign, are sacked, are made redundant or for any other reason; your employer must pay out all of the annual leave that you have accrued and not yet taken, at your current rate of pay.

2. Notice period paid out
Your contract of employment sets out how much notice your employer has to give before terminating you, or how much notice you must give if you resign. In a redundancy, you are entitled to either:
(a) work out your notice period - they tell you now but you don't actually finish up until the end of the period
or, more commonly,
(b) payment in lieu of notice - you leave today, but they pay you as if you worked out the period
Also, if you're over 45 years old and you have been with your company for more than 2 years, you get an additional week's notice (or notice in lieu) on top of this.
3. Possible severance payment
Employers have no obligation to make a severance payment to you, so an entitlement to any severance payment will come down to what was in your original contract, or the company policy. Big companies tend to make severance payments, whilst smaller companies tend not to. These are where the big money comes from. Policies tend to relate to the number of years you have worked with the company (service period). Some companies have a straight calculation eg. 3 weeks pay for every year, while other companies have more complex formulas eg. must have worked 12 months to get severance, 2 weeks pay for each of the 3 years after that and 3 weeks pay for any additional years.

4. Additional entitlements
  • You may be entitled to Long Service Leave, or pro-rata Long Service Leave, depending on which state you live in. 
  • You may be entitled to additional benefits if they are in your contract of employment.
5. Tax-free amounts
Large redundancy pay outs also incur a tax break (called an Eligible Termination Payout - ETP) on the first few thousand dollars. The Australian Taxation Office can provide information on this. It has changed several times recently, and can be complex, which is why I am not going to outline it here.

How to ensure you get what you're entitled to
If you're not sure whether your employer has paid you the correct amount, you should ring your payroll person, or the person who gave you the bad news, and ask for a break-down. When you call, don't act angry or forceful. Simply tell the person that you were made redundant but you're not sure what you're entitled to and you were wondering if they could help.

If you feel worried about doing this, don't be. I often have people ring me with these questions. In my experience, even the nastiest managers are feeling guilty for making your life crap at this stage, and will be sympathetic and likely to help you.